On “Honor Killing”
Corrine Schneider | Posted October 20th, 2009 | Uncategorized
There are two types of honor in traditional Arab society: sharaf and ‘ird. Sharaf is the honor and dignity of the family or tribe as a social unit, as well as the individual. Moral conduct and model behavior, such as acts of kindness, hospitality, courage, and the like deemed highly important in Arab culture, can increase sharaf, whereas acts deemed improper or in poor taste can decrease it.
Separately, ‘irf refers to the honor of women in terms of concepts of chastity and “purity,” and can only decrease in value. “Misconduct” or violation in the way of pre- or extra-marital sexual affairs can damage a woman’s ‘irf, which trumps the family’s sharaf, and therefore also destroys the family’s honor. The only way for the family to re-claim it’s sharaf and standing is to kill the female relative who has brought shame upon it. Hence the controversial term, “Honor Killing.”
My colleagues at WATC believe that the term “Honor Killing” is a highly misleading euphemism for murder. One among them, Itaf Yousef, claims that many cases prosecuted as “Honor Killing” are in fact cold blooded murders having nothing to do with the concept of honor; instead, perpetrators in these cases use the the “Honor Killing” classification as a cover up because punishment for such killings are far more lenient than those accorded for murder.
“Often, women are killed because of money,” Itaf says. “For example, if a father passes away, his daughter will receive part of his inheritance. The men in the family will want a larger share and kill the girl. Or say the husband of a woman dies. His brother will kill the wife so that the husband’s family can claim the inheritance. I’ve heard of many stories like this. Unfortunately, when the police or courts are told by a family that the killing has been committed to reclaim honor, they either don’t take investigations seriously or don’t investigate at all.”
Indeed, there have been cases in which a woman was murdered on suspicion or false accusation of participating in sexual “misconduct,” and was later redeemed by medical examination of the hymen, discovered unbroken.
Itaf has heard of a few cases in which a father or brother of a girl rapes and later kills her to prevent her from informing others. Cases such as these, she says, point to a troubled society. Yet the occurrence of “honor killing,” both for the sake of family honor or otherwise, does not reflect on society at large. (I’m waiting to hear back from a few organizations regarding recent years’ statistics, and will post them soon to lend context in terms of how many killings are taking place per year and where they are most frequently occurring).
I interviewed my colleague Dima, who reveals what she believes is the root problem in the concept of killing for honor’s sake.
Other colleagues at WATC, Mona Hamed and Amal Juma’, created a public service announcement earlier this year in a campaign against “honor killing.” You can view their video here:
The web is flooded with articles about “honor killing.” To learn more, do a quick google search. But for now, read this informative and comprehensive article from the Middle East Report: http://www.merip.org/mer/mer206/ruggi.htm






















Thanks for your question, Ramtin. I asked one of my colleagues at work, Itaf Yousef, a veteran female activist who has seen a lot in her lifetime. She told me that Hamas does not accept the Women’s Bill of Rights, as they have a different concept of a woman’s role in society and their views do not coincide with the Bill’s principles. The notion that the woman’s role is to be a good mother and (house) wife, who serves and obeys her husband, is not unique to male and female supporters of Hamas; in fact, this kind of thinking prevails across Palestine. So in a way, priorities among many Palestinian women are different, and for them, the principles of the Bill of Rights do not resonate. Furthermore, the majority of politically active women in Palestine are of the intellectual and financial elite living mainly in the West Bank city of Ramallah. The women’s agenda has not quite reached the villages and rural areas of the country, and so even in a liberated, secure and democratic Palestine, Itaf doesn’t believe that there would be a widespread push for increased women’s rights. Does this sufficiently answer your question? Look out for my video interview with Itaf, as she touches on some very interesting issues related to your questions.
Maybe a bad question, but what is the reception to the Bill of Rights from Hamas leadership? Does the GUPW feel like inroads can be made within the current fractured Palestinian leadership. It does not surprise me that Abu Mazen would support such a move but in an ideal secure, democratic Palestine would these type of laws, securing the rights of women, find any traction? Of course, these are purely questions trying to gain a better understanding of the challenges the leadership of GUPW feels they are facing.